What was the ruling of the Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona?

The Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that law enforcement must inform suspects of their rights to silence and legal counsel before interrogating them. This came about because Ernesto Miranda was not informed of his rights, which led to a confession that he later argued should be inadmissible in court. The Court's decision underscored the importance of protecting an individual's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and their Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Thus, the requirement for Miranda rights to be read to suspects is a key procedural safeguard designed to ensure that individuals are aware of their rights, thereby reinforcing their protection against coercive interrogation practices. This landmark ruling has had a lasting impact on law enforcement procedures across the United States, ensuring that suspects are consistently informed of their rights before any questioning occurs.